Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ProductSifter (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete Keeper   |   76   |   Disclaimer  23:46, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

ProductSifter
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Kept last time because of "no consensus", but not a single other user cast an opinion except the nominator and the AFD-closer. Montchav (talk) 11:55, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Weak Keep There appears to be some notability but, as the nominator points out, no interest by other editors. Treat the "weak keep" as a "delete" if no one steps up on this one. --Stormbay (talk) 01:46, 11 February 2008 (UTC) Delete as above. --Stormbay (talk) 16:26, 19 February 2008 (UTC)


 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:09, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Delete Lots of ghits, but almost none that aren't just backlinks. Out of the external links in the article, only the piece in the timesonline even mentions the site. It's a for-profit venture that doesn't seem to be particularly notable. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 23:19, 15 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.