Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Productivity game


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:50, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Productivity game

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

unremarkable article John Collier (talk) 21:20, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 21:37, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * That rationale has no basis in Deletion policy. Please provide a proper rationale that is based upon our policies and guidelines. Uncle G (talk) 21:51, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No reliable sourecs, original research, neologism, advert. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 22:02, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. I think that the nominator said "unremarkable" when he meant not notable. English's rich lode of synonyms contains many pitfalls.  But this article surely is non-notable, and moreover is about some goo-goo consultant's buzzword wannabe jargon, being about video games that are designed to increase employee productivity and get real work done through the playing of a game.  This seems likely promotional in intent.  - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:19, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Please Do Not Delete - (from the Rosss2009 - the original poster) - this is not meant to be promotional, an advertisement or consultant jargon. There are a set of games that are used for work that are known by this name. This is a category within Serious Games. Thank you for considering this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rosss2009 (talk • contribs) 20:35, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * — Rosss2009 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.