Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Productronica


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I'm choosing keep - please discuss merger or redirect on the article talk page. Missvain (talk) 23:08, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Productronica

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Appears to fail WP:GNG through lack of reliable source coverage. Created by a single-purpose account. — Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 17:05, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. — Naddruf  (talk ~ contribs) 17:05, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Naddruf  (talk ~ contribs) 17:05, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. — Naddruf  (talk ~ contribs) 17:05, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. — Naddruf  (talk ~ contribs) 17:05, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Delete or merge?
 * Delete, fails WP:GNG, WP:NCORP, and WP:NEVENTS. SailingInABathTub (talk) 19:37, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge or redirect to Messe München, the parent company. —Kusma (𐍄·𐌺) 08:29, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   10:34, 11 April 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:54, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment, the appropriate conclusion here may depend on the result of Articles_for_deletion/Messe_München. SailingInABathTub (talk) 13:39, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. I was going to vote 'delete this spam', but to my surprise, a quick BEFORE gives us coverage like, , and some more. Color me surprised but this event is notable. Did nobody bother clicking in the GScholar link here? Ping User:Kusma, User:SailingInABathTub, User:Naddruf... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  06:06, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I didn't check GScholar - did you find more than one source though (those three links all being from the same publisher)? SailingInABathTub (talk) 07:51, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
 * , Lost my reply, twice. Emerald Publishing is reliable, there is coverage in at least three English-language journals. Not sure if the Russian-language coverage is reliable, but English is plenty enough. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 02:26, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: I'm only relisting this a third time because it appears there is still some unresolved business regarding sourcing per User:Piotrus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 17:40, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge to parent company. If anyone wants to split it back out with sources, they're more than welcome to. jp×g 07:07, 10 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.