Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prof. Hari Govind Choudhary


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 03:50, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Prof. Hari Govind Choudhary

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Poorly-sourced biography of an apparently non-notable professor. I am unable to find any reliable sources about the subject. Fails WP:BASIC. - MrX 18:24, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. - MrX 18:25, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. - MrX 18:25, 5 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. HJ Nitchell (talk) 18:29, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * This user has been blocked for impersonating another user. This is the only edit by this user that I haven't reverted, but you may want to take it with a grain of salt (or remove it altogether, if you think that's right). --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:39, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * It certainly doesn't add much content to the debate. Removing it would cause no harm. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:50, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Please see WP:PERNOM before making votes like that. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 21:20, 5 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Essentially unsourced, and after listing only that he was a professor (not notable by itself) the article degenerates into genealogy cruft about his family, presenting no notable accomplishments of the subject. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:49, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable professor. Buggie111 (talk) 20:27, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete -First Professor of Hindi in Bihar, is an unusual claim that being unsourced seems like a hoax. I'm seeing zero results on Google news and books and WP:INDAFD search engines. However being a professor is not itself a inclusion criteria on Wikipedia. Subject fails WP:NACADEMIC and WP:GNG. Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  20:40, 5 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Lacks even a single reliable independent secondary source to establish notability as required by WP:GNG and completely fails to assert any possible reason why the subject might be considered notable even in lieu of sources under WP:ANYBIO.  Though not by itself a reason to delete, I note that the article appears to be an WP:Autobiography by an WP:SPA and that an earlier WP:PROD was contested by an IP editor, also an WP:SPA, quite possibly the same individual.  Msnicki (talk) 21:12, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Per above and Lacks references.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 02:47, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.