Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Profane Genocidal Creations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:11, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Profane Genocidal Creations

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable album, from a band that is most likely also non-notable. Jrtayloriv (talk) 22:35, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. I find the band to be notable, given their biography in their main article, and I would therefore argue that per WP policy the albums of a notable band are themselves notable if there is enough information present in an article. This album page could be categorized as a stub though. Doomsdayer520 (talk) 11:57, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * According to WP:MUSIC, an album from a notable band may be considered notable, just by nature of it being released by that band. But this band is not highly notable, nor has this album received significant coverage in reliable sources. And the article consists almost entirely of a track listing. According to what I have seen at WP:MUSIC, articles that don't have significant mainstream coverage, and consist mostly of a track listing should just be integrated into the article for the group. Jrtayloriv (talk) 20:34, 2 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 00:36, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per Doomsdayer.--Epeefleche (talk) 23:40, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:35, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Weak keep. Tough decision on this one, I disagree with the nom that the band is non-notable in that they have released two albums on Century Media Records, and there is plenty of WP:3PARTY coverage for those two albums plus a full biography of the band at allmusic. Unfortunately this album predates the band's signing with Century Media Records and the only WP:RS I can find covering it, actually only mention it in passing when discussing the later two albums, here (translated from Italian) and here. It is listed at allmusic but not reviewed.  I'm leaning towards keep because their more recent albums (deservedly) have pages so going back through their discography provides a nice historical record.  If anyone can find me a nice review in German or some other language I will change to Keep and get rid of the 'weak', but I looked and couldn't find anything decent. J04n(talk page) 11:14, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.