Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Profectus theory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:50, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Profectus theory

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable term, with zero relevant ghits that I can find (see also discussion on Talk page). None of the references used in the article mention the term, either. Some of the content might be salvageable for the human overpopulation article, so CSD may not be appropriate, but the term itself seems to be made up. Anaxial (talk) 08:40, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:52, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, this term seems made up. Yeenosaurus   (talk) 🍁 04:18, 4 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - at the very least, the term itself seems to be an invention. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 07:20, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can find no evidence, outside this article, that either "Profectus Theory" or "Profectus Point" has ever been used. (I wonder why those words are capitalised, none of them is a proper noun.) Maproom (talk) 07:50, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. From my searches, the only uses of the term seem to be on Wikipedia, primarily in edits by, which appears to be a Single Purpose Account. --SteveMcCluskey (talk) 13:07, 9 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.