Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Profero


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:36, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Profero

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Philafrenzy (talk) 00:07, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete lack of RS indicates failure of GNG BlueSalix (talk) 00:29, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Out of curiosity, is your !vote based exclusively upon sources within the article, or does it include the availability of sources via internet news and book searches? Northamerica1000(talk) 22:12, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 27 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. Notable. Passes WP:CORPDEPTH. Source examples include:
 * The Wall Street Journal
 * Advertising Age
 * The Drum
 * Advertising Age
 * Advertising Age
 * The New York Times (Short paragraph).
 * – In the event you haven't already done so, please consider performing source searching suggested at Section D of WP:BEFORE prior to nominating articles for deletion. Thank you for your consideration. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:07, 28 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:51, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:00, 10 February 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.