Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Professional Reputation Management


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. — TKD:: Talk  02:23, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Professional Reputation Management

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

It's not clear that this article discusses anything other than standard Public relations techniques, wrapped in a new fancy name. The link to a single provider smacks of advertising, although the article has been revised from its initial form to address blatant advertising issues. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:43, 21 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Redirect - to public relations. -- Whpq (talk) 18:18, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete without a redirect. The best redirect would be to the existing article, Reputation management, and I do not see how addding the word "professional" makes it a reasonable search term. A spam neologism like this does not warrant even a redirect.DGG (talk) 03:30, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   kur  ykh   00:20, 26 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment - the topic presumably is Reputation management; however that (terrible, terrible) article doesn't look to contain information about people. I would be tempted to advise a merge, but I'm both reluctant to add more to such an overweight and badly sourced article as that and unsure as to the notability of "Professional Reputation Management". – Toon (talk)  00:32, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as a non-notable neologism, sounds more like a buzzword for headhunters and relations people, barely enough context to actually make it a subject able to have encyclopedic coverage. Cquan (after the beep...) 06:12, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, agree with Cquan. This is stealth spam. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:43, 26 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.