Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Professional doctorate


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:53, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Professional doctorate
Unnecessary article. Nothing exists here that doesn't already appear in the much more expanded Doctorate — NM  Chico  24   21:54, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep: It's barely a week old, it seems to have the possibility of expanding into a decent sub-article. A bit redundant for the time being perhaps, but at least give it a chance to fix itself up. --SeizureDog 21:59, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * How do you feel that this article can be expanded to not say exactly the same thing that's already covered under Doctorate? — NM  Chico  24  [[Image:Flag of New Mexico.svg|25px]] 22:11, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Not my field; I don't know much about the subject matter so I don't know. However, if you feel that it just repeats information from Doctorate then perhaps the information in Doctorate should be removed and not the other way around. Make it to be a split.--SeizureDog 06:12, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * That doesn't really answer my question, although it does generate a new one. Why would we want to split the Doctorate article? —  NM  Chico  24  [[Image:Flag of New Mexico.svg|25px]] 07:35, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and Merge to Doctorate. No need for separate subarticle. Merge as a subsection to the Doctorate article, where it belongs. If the subsection grows in time to be large and unwieldy, then we can move it back to its own page. At the moment, its an unnecessary fork/duplication. Actually, it'd be more expedient simply to slap mergeto and mergefrom tags on the pages and wait a few days to see if anyone objects, rather than take this to afd. If people object and the merge is controversial, take it to WP:PM.Bwithh 23:21, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Normally I would agree, but there's really very little to merge. — NM  Chico  24  [[Image:Flag of New Mexico.svg|25px]] 23:38, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, NMChico24 22:27, 6 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. (delete and merge are two different things... it may not make sense to say delete and merge as a single comment.. delete OR merge may make more sense IMHO. ++Lar: t/c 01:40, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete/Merge to Doctorate. Seems to repeat the list on Doctorate but lack the text information. ThuranX 02:28, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above. sharp  dust  02:34, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect to Doctorate. There's no difference between the terms that's worth having a different article. - Richardcavell 02:56, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge into Doctorate--Ageo020 05:56, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * <Merge into Doctorate Delete--chemica 06:37, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete outright, there really isn't any mergeable content. --Core des at talk. ^_^ 09:07, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete no need to explain Bustter 12:41, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is nothing here that isn't in Doctorate.  If it becomes significantly more than listcruft on that page, then it can be re-created.  I'd be very suprised, though -- there is really nothing to this area other than a list. TedTalk/Contributions 21:33, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, and merge anything that can be merged into doctorate. Should this be deleted, consideration ought to be given to nominating Professional Master's degree for an AfD discussion (Professional Bachelor's degree has already been deleted per this AfD discussion). Agent 86 17:29, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete —  They can (or maybe are, I didn't look) be put into a category. That's what they are for. &mdash; RevRagnarok  Talk Contrib 02:17, 9 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.