Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Professional e-mail address


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete both per consensus. Although I personally think a decent article could be written on e-mail forwarding, doing so would require looking for sources instead of writing from personal knowledge. GRBerry 16:45, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Professional e-mail address

 * — (View AfD)

leftover corporate vanity from Articles for deletion/ITZoom. Check the edit history. Watchsmart 23:06, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Also nominating E-mail forwarding for deletion, since it is the same sort of advertising by the same author. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Watchsmart (talk • contribs) 23:12, 10 January 2007 (UTC).


 * Delete Complete OR, and not particularly notable OR. -- Kicking222 23:32, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * This article is unprofessional because the text presented here has no relation to an encyclopedia article. Or were both these articles just thinly veiled attempts to promote ITZoom?  *Delete both.  --Elkman - (Elkspeak) 23:53, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete both as OR, and the fact that "teddy.bears@myunusual-domain.com" is considered as 'professional' :) SkierRMH 07:50, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all as OR. And what if that professional address comes from a spammer, what would they say about that? Nate 11:36, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete All, though it breaks my heart to delete anything that refers to teddy-bears. Still, I'm trying to be professional here, so I'll cite a couple of reasons: OR, and inadequately referenced. WMMartin 18:47, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.