Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proffiti


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Nja 247 08:44, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Proffiti

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article is original research, does not assert importance or significance, is non-notable, is not verifiable and there is a conflict of interest. Drawn Some (talk) 03:33, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research and a protologism. No external sources reporting on the term making verification impossible.  --TeaDrinker (talk) 04:38, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Although it sounds like a good idea a WP article will have to wait until it catches on a bit more. Steve Dufour (talk) 04:59, 27 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:NEO not notable (yet)  Chzz  ►  07:18, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.