Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Profusionism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete per G3; no sources, hoax. Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :D  23:22, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Profusionism

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Apparently this is an "emerging" branch of knowledge. It doesn't appear to have emerged very far at all. The only thing a Google search on "Profusionism" is something to do with creation science and nothing to do with this. Reyk YO!  19:35, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - No Google hits - nothing in Google News. Finally, where you would expect to see at least 1 cite,Google Scholar, nothing. To me that is three strikes. ShoesssS Talk 19:59, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * delete as per unsourced gibberish.Bali ultimate (talk) 23:07, 15 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.