Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Programme level


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  14:37, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Programme level

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Ambiguous term, unsourced and I found it difficult to find good sources to add. Boleyn (talk) 14:41, 8 June 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Coco bb8  (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 14:52, 15 June 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:12, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:47, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Radio,  and Television.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  17:30, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.