Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Progress Ridge Town Square


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Beaverton, Oregon. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 14:19, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Progress Ridge Town Square

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Reviewed during NPP. No indication of wp:notability under GNG or SNG. A "lifestyle center"/ small mall with 30 stores. Of the two references, one is a database type listing and the other is about a nearby trail and does not even mention it. North8000 (talk) 14:26, 22 April 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:08, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:15, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:16, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Travel and tourism-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:17, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Beaverton, Oregon (with the history preserved under the redirect), where the subject is already mentioned, per Deletion policy. I did not find significant coverage in reliable sources in my searches for sources. A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow editors to selectively merge any content that can be reliably sourced to the target article. A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow the redirect to be undone if significant coverage in reliable sources is found in the future. Cunard (talk) 05:41, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete This is a very generic shopping center with no outstanding anchor outside AMC.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 16:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I agree that the mall is not notable. I find a redirect to be a good alternative to deletion, particularly since the mall is already mentioned in the proposed target article (Beaverton, Oregon). Cunard (talk) 09:33, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - run of the mill shopping center with just the usual coverage. I am not opposed to a redirect in such cases. Bearian (talk) 12:48, 8 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.