Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Progression of women in hard rock


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete.  jj137  ♠ 17:32, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Progression of women in hard rock

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Original research. Delete. Blanchardb- Me MyEars MyMouth -timed 03:32, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, OR. Delete. J- ſtan ContribsUser page 04:23, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, an interesting topic, but this WP:OR essay doesn't belong here. Lankiveil (talk) 04:38, 23 December 2007 (UTC).
 * Delete OR, notable topic but perhaps there should be a more general article like "Women in popular music" before it started to get specific like this. -- Nick Penguin ( contribs ) 05:35, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete The statement that women artists prior to Janis Joplin were "chosen for looks and rarely for talent" is an insult to Janis and every other female artist. While everyone is entitled to an opinion, pure opinion doesn't belong in an encylopedia.  Mandsford (talk) 14:15, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:OR. Topic itself could be notable but no evidence of this. JJL (talk) 17:08, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete doesn't merit an article. Original research, etc. -RiverHockey (talk) 02:14, 24 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.