Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Progressive International


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:38, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Progressive International

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Doesn't seem to be notable. A large amount of the sources on the page (or in the COI edit request on the talk that I declined) are self-published, while the non-self published sources are either non-reliable sources, opinion pieces, or only give a fleeting mention. It therefore appears to not have WP:SIGCOV from multiple reliable sources independent of the subject itself and thereby fails WP:NCORP. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 05:36, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:45, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:45, 16 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment - I have found one reliable independent in-depth source (a profile) about the organization, but more are needed to satisfy WP:GNG. - Tristan Surtel (talk) 08:58, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Some other sources are The Wire, BuzzFeed News, and Morning Star, but they mostly just announce that the organization has been established. It has gotten some attention because of its prominent backers including Bernie Sanders, Noam Chomsky, and Yanis Varoufakis, and most other articles discuss Progressive International in relation to these people. So, I feel that for now it could be better discussed in their articles. Since De Correspondent seems to be the only source that goes in depth about the organization itself and since it is unclear whether this organization will become important or will just disappear (it hasn't achieved anything yet), it's a delete for now. - Tristan Surtel (talk) 09:57, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep A global political organisation, far more appropriate to apply WP:NONPROFIT. Simple searching turns up multiple independent RS.


 * AfD is not clean up. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 10:01, 16 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep per Goldsztajn. There are a number of independent sources covering the subject in detail.--User:Namiba 14:16, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep has coverage in numerous reliable sources, including negative analysis of the group which indicates that political analysts of various persuasions deem it worthy of analysis and coverage. SFB 18:01, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, the sources found by Goldsztajn demonstrate notability. Devonian Wombat (talk) 03:15, 17 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.