Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Progressive Judaism (Germany)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was WITHDRAWN. -Splash - tk 19:02, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Progressive Judaism (Germany)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Note: this article was originally part of another article proposed for deletion - see View AfD) - I believe it is the wish of HG to have all articles involved in the refactoring of Reform Judaism and Progressive Judaism proposed for deletion so I'm am voluntarily adding the AfD Egfrank 14:04, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Strong oppose: refactoring of this article is necessary: please see the following AfD's for additional pro/con comments:
 * Articles for deletion/Reform Judaism (United Kingdom)
 * Articles for deletion/Reform Judaism (North America)
 * Articles for deletion/Liberal Judaism (United Kingdom)
 * Articles for deletion/German Reform movement (Judaism)
 * Egfrank 14:04, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

HG. I have not requested this AfD. (I've also deleted a comment of mine moved by the nom from another page.) Perhaps this was an attempt at humor, at doing me a favor, or at making me look foolish, but I don't think it's helpful to nominate articles for AfD in order to oppose deletion. Thanks. HG | Talk 02:08, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * HG - No intent to make you look foolish was intended. When User:IZAK moved German Reform movement (Judaism) to Reform Judaism (Germany) he unwittingly turned what was supposed to be a historical article into an article on the present day German progressive movement.  Because the historical period needs to be linked to separately from the modern movement (the historical period reflects intellectual history shared between several streams of Judaism + German philosophical and intellectual history), I split the article into a historical and current portion.


 * Since the original combined article had an AfD, I was worried that if I did not duplicate the AfD on both halves of the split article, the split up of the article might have been viewed as an "attempt to escape an AfD" for at least part of the article.  Rather than risk the accusation, I added the AfD to both halves of the article. Egfrank 04:20, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, I'll agf your afd. Anyway, this AfD can be closed as Keep or withdrawn.HG | Talk 05:00, 7 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.