Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Progressive Liberty Party Australia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. AustralianRupert (talk) 07:26, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Progressive Liberty Party Australia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable minor political party (quite possibly even WP:NFT). User:MB had tagged it for notability and then PRODed it as "Cannot find significant coverage in independent sources"; dePRODed and even detagged (without fixing the problem...only cites are PRIMARY or DEADLINK badly enough cannot verify) by creator. DMacks (talk) 23:32, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
 * I was the one who PRODed it, not MB. I could not find coverage so recommend delete. buidhe 23:34, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Whoops, sorry for misreading the history of PROD vs tag! DMacks (talk) 03:29, 9 February 2020 (UTC)


 * This article covers important local issues and is an important contributor to politics in the Eastern Suburbs of Melbourne. This article will only gain further traction, it is highly relevant to many people. The second reference is not a DEADLINK, it is a citation and link to the place of purchase and official website for a book that makes mention of the articles topic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr.Editorias (talk • contribs) 00:14, 9 February 2020 (UTC)  — Dr.Editorias (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * A school yearbook is likely neither reliable nor independent. The news website is reliable but you would need to provide a working link or verifiable citation so that someone besides you could find it (WP:V). buidhe 00:22, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:12, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:12, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:12, 9 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete A Google search produces no sources at all which demonstrate that this political party exists, and it doesn't appear on the Victorian Electoral Commission's list of Currently registered parties. As such, WP:ORG and WP:V clearly aren't met. Nick-D (talk) 03:59, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as apparent hoax. Cannot find any sources at all and clearly does not meet WP:GNG. At best looks like a school project. Bookscale (talk) 05:29, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Absolutely not notable.  Nothing to demonstrate existence.  Not registered at either state or federal level.  (Note that the three principals named in the article are the names of real people who seem to have attended Yarra Valley Grammar.  There are easily findable sources indicating this.) Could be a hoax or just a "naive" group of otherwise genuine people.  Aoziwe (talk) 11:14, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. I could not find a single reference in a ProQuest database search of Aust and NZ newspapers. Fails WP:NOTE. Cabrils (talk) 02:13, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unreliable and no evidence of existence, does not pass WP:NOTE (talk) 22:21, 10 February 2020 (UTC) - This edit by Dr.Editorias
 * "Comment The above unsigned vote is the article creator...Gogolwold (talk) 12:03, 10 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete as explain by others adequately already.Gogolwold (talk) 12:03, 10 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.