Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ProjeLead


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 10:49, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

ProjeLead

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

No indication that the product meets WP:notability guidelines. The one independent reference given is a French website to promote open sources programs and is for a product called Adheo - ProjeLead is just a tag on the article. The article seems to consist of not much more than a list of features. Google searches do not show much for either ProjeLead or Adheo. noq (talk) 15:40, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

1- ProjeLead is Adheo. Adheo has been renamed as ProjeLead in summer 2010 (please check this out www.adheo-solution.fr) 2- Reference only in French. Yes framasoft article is in french, but the ProjeLead is french and just started been offered in english so the product is not yet known in the anglophone world. 3- the notability criteria should applied evenly. As you can see on this wikipedia page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_project_management_software) 50 products are already referenced on wikipedia, not sure the notability applies to all of them. Plus ProjeLead has been adopted by dozens of organizations which should constitue a serious reference. I am open to discuss and help you prove that this article has its place on wikipedia. Thnaks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Incognito75 (talk • contribs) 04:55, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Please read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. You will need to show that this page meets the notability guidelines. noq (talk) 11:20, 30 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:12, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

My point is not to say other stuff exist, it s to say that reviewrs should apply objective arguments.

Anyway, I just added another reference about Projelead (formerly known as Adheo, PMS). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Incognito75 (talk • contribs) 17:08, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Note that this is another web based project management software that offers collaborative features.  Promotional in tone, the websites cited are not reliable sources and I found no better. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:10, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Can you please while you are there work on the 50 other products referenced in this page : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_project_management_software At least the cleaning will be more accurate. Thanks for the hard work deleting other people's work.  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete blatant promo. Wile E. Heresiarch (talk) 06:08, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No redeeming value to balance the fact that this is an advert. No hits on google beyond "this exists" to assert notability. Sven Manguard  Talk  05:46, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.