Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project ACES


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  So Why  07:21, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Project ACES

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional and unreferenced Rathfelder (talk) 21:39, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Borders on an A7. Definitely fails GNG. No refs. The only ones I found were self-promotional. South Nashua (talk) 23:23, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment: I have added a couple of newspaper references. They are brief notices, as would be expected of an event in elementary schools, but do seem to indicate high participation numbers over quite a long period. Also note the first 5 items from the Google Books search, though they are again brief notes. AllyD (talk) 08:06, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:30, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  01:24, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  01:25, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 02:04, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- now with references, but still WP:ADVOCACY on a nn initiative. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:10, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Fails WP:GNG and blatant WP:ADVOCACY Rrachet (talk) 15:54, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:07, 11 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.