Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Blue Beam (NASA)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 22:31, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Project Blue Beam (NASA)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Very poorly referenced conspiracy theory. Typical of the species, it contains a lot of dubious sources, sources unrelated to the point the're supposed to support, and random attempts to link unrelated issues together with no support. It's not even very coherent. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 10:51, 11 September 2010 (UTC) Created for an IP  GB fan  10:59, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * bună ziua domnișoarelor (si domnilor) (nu mă interesează că nu știți română la fel cum nu vă interesează pe voi munca individuală a fiecărei persoane).. Mai pe scurt v-am salutat pe buletin și luați și ștergeți faceți ce vreți, că atât știți, dar dacă ar fi nevoie sa contribuiți, sa ajutați, ferească sfântu... în fine... asta la vista ... Dogaru Florin (talk) 11:58, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Google translate provides the following:
 * "Hello ladies (and gentlemen) (I do not care that you're not Romanian as you do not care how you work the individual person) .. In short we have welcomed the report and take and remove what you do that so you know, but if they want to contribute, to help, beware Saint ... Finally ... asta la vista ..." 69.181.249.92 (talk) 19:55, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 06:51, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as not notable. There is no significant coverage of this conspiracy theory in reliable sources. Note that the coverage doesn't need to support the truth of the theory (it can be skeptical), but the theory is not well enough known to justify this article. Pburka (talk) 22:13, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conspiracy theories-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:53, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete, an improper synthesis of mostly unreliable sources. The book, Project Blue Beam (NASA), Presse libre nord-américaine [1994], does not appear in any book directories. Jezhotwells (talk) 11:41, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete the whole thing reads like original research— Chris! c / t 21:39, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.