Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Foundry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:27, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Project Foundry

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Software/web content with no assertion of notability Ironholds (talk) 15:43, 31 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak delete. Only reliable source I could find was this one, which only mentions the software in the sidebar (at the bottom of the page, just above the comments).  It's a start, but we need more like this to be able to include this software. JulesH (talk) 16:16, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 5 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  | Talk 01:10, 10 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete there is really no indication of notability in the article, and as noted, no further sources have been forthcoming. To me this borders on a speedy deletion per criteria A7.  --TeaDrinker (talk) 04:08, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

The is a Project Foundry and it is still going strong. The current Army Regulation that covers it is AR 350-32 http://www.apd.army.mil/pdffiles/r350_32.pdf. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.79.7.15 (talk) 19:52, 26 February 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.