Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Mimesis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 03:39, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Project Mimesis

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) There are no worthwhile redirect targets. czar 11:49, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  czar  11:49, 6 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: Since its creation in 2006 (!), the article has stayed unsourced. This seems to be because it simply hasn't been covered in any independent, reliable sources. This was all I could find, and that is neither significant coverage nor a reliable source. Kolbasz (talk) 15:06, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - a few trivial mentions of the topic in books, but I could find no significant coverage. Yvarta (talk) 15:40, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:47, 6 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Google finds no sources which are simultaneously reliable, independent, and in-depth. Google Books finds nothing with "project mimesis" along with "xbox" or any of the creators' handles. Google Scholar finds this paper, which is discussing a defunct project about storytelling in video games, called Mimesis, run by some people at the North Carolina University Dept. of Computer Science. That project had a bunch of papers written about it and so has a decent chance of passing GNG, but if it's the same as the one described in the article (I think it isn't), the article does such a bad job of describing it that WP:TNT applies. FourViolas (talk) 05:34, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
 * That NCSU project is a completely different thing. Kolbasz (talk) 12:22, 7 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete -- nothing suggests notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:36, 7 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.