Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Octopath Traveler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Per speedy keep rationale: "The nomination is so erroneous that it indicates the nominator has not even read the article in question." Article is already sufficiently sourced and was demonstrated to have even more sources. (non-admin closure) ZXCVBNM (TALK) 17:02, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Project Octopath Traveler

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

unreleased software. CelenaSkaggs (talk) 21:25, 14 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Draftify (or Userfy) until release and substantially reviewed enough to meet notability requirements. Softlavender (talk) 21:31, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - Terrible failure of before. This game has received a ton of reliable source coverage, especially recently, since a widely publicized demo was released just yesterday. Sergecross73   msg me  21:53, 14 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment - Source list, all with a consensus for being reliable/usable per WP:VG/S:
 * 1) http://www.rollingstone.com/glixel/news/demo-project-octopath-traveler-right-now-w503043
 * 2) https://www.vg247.com/2017/09/14/project-octopath-traveler-has-a-demo-out-now-check-out-this-trailer-to-learn-about-the-story-and-combat/
 * 3) https://www.engadget.com/2017/09/13/project-octopath-traveler-nintendo-switch-demo-today/
 * 4) http://m.ign.com/articles/2017/09/13/square-enixs-project-octopath-traveler-demo-available-today-on-switch
 * 5) https://www.gamespot.com/articles/switch-exclusive-rpg-from-square-enix-project-octo/1100-6453328/  Sergecross73   msg me  21:56, 14 September 2017 (UTC)


 * (edit conflict) Keep speedily (or at worst, restore redirect to List of Nintendo Switch games). It's worth attempting to engage the page history and/or talk page before coming to AfD. This topic is a useful search term. The sourcing in a video game reliable sources custom Google search is enough to support a small article. If the article's current referencing issues are insurmountable, restoration of the redirect would suffice, but I don't see how outright deletion would be warranted, nevertheless any policy-based deletion rationale from the nom. (not watching, please ping) czar  21:58, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:16, 15 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep: Definitely meets the notability guideline. Nominator's rationale for deletion is bizarre. AdrianGamer (talk) 10:02, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - Widespread coverage from reliable video game sources. Web source search returns over 300,000 results. With the demo releasing yesterday, we now have some in depth previews as well: . There's enough coverage from sources to expand the gameplay and development sections into a satisfactory pre-release article. --The1337gamer (talk) 16:21, 15 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.