Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Powder


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Notability hasn't been established by those arguing to keep. Fabrictramp |  talk to me  21:27, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Project Powder

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unreleased game, still in beta, non-notable. ukexpat (talk) 21:13, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- ukexpat (talk) 21:18, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as noted above. Rob Banzai (talk) 21:23, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I object to this as why would there be fansites made for this game if this game is "not-notable"? There is already a link posted linking to an interview by onRPG, which I think is highly notable. I disagree on the fact that this article should not be posted on the wikipedia. Windrider07 (talk) 21:33, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Fan sites aren't ever reliable. Furthermore, the interview is the only reliable source, and doesn't seem to be exclusively about the game. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Chirps•Clams•Chowder) 21:44, 18 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 21:50, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

I object as well (obviously - I created the page). The game's in beta currently, but will probably be live in less than a month. Also, how can a game that already has two fansites be "non-notable?" Ceridian (Ceridian) 21:53, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: Fan sites are not reliable sources, it's a simple as that. –  ukexpat (talk) 21:53, 18 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - the single interview isn't enough to meet requirements for notability. -- Whpq (talk) 12:37, 20 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.