Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Roxivia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:14, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Project Roxivia

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article has been speedy deleted 3 times before and has been put up again as G11 (I've removed that to bring it here). Original author is intent of it being here. I think best to have a full consensus of opinions as to the suitability of this page, then if consensus is to delete then we bury it once and for all or maybe offer userifcation  Ron h jones (Talk) 22:07, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Poorly written, notability is not established, and only sources are youtube. JDDJS (talk) 22:10, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete- Unnotable game being developed by unknown game designers. No reliable third party sources exist.  Fails WP:Notability in pretty much every way possible.Rorshacma (talk) 22:32, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NFT Bazj (talk) 22:23, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. - Denimadept (talk) 23:03, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:CRYSTAL & per nomination. Shearonink (talk) 23:34, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per CSD A7 and G11; not notable and purely promotional. Is it in any way different from the article that's been speedied three times?  City O f Silver  23:44, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * User:Toddst1 has speedily deleted it per G11.  City O f Silver  00:23, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.