Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Voldemort


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to LinkedIn. Seems to be adequate consensus that the topic on its own is not sufficiently notable to justify a stand-alone article. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:33, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Project Voldemort

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 21:36, 17 December 2009 (UTC) This article is just a stub, but could quickly become much more with a little research. Putting this up for deletion is completely irresponsible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.9.106.220 (talk) 21:23, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to LinkedIn as the project's developer. --Cyber cobra (talk) 22:47, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 17:02, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- Cyber cobra  (talk) 21:54, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Prove that the sofware is notable. Joe Chill (talk) 23:09, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep: this software enjoys mild popularity at high scalability conferences, there are a couple of presentations / speeches / reports on it done by Voldemort spokesman Jay Kreps: . As this product is not of wide public interest, it would probably never accumulate enough public attention outside of these semi-academic / semi-commercial circles. --GreyCat (talk) 20:25, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to Linkedin; verifiable, but not notable at the moment, unlike BigTable and Dynamo (storage system). Pcap ping  23:04, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.