Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project car tuner magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Scott Burley (talk) 05:37, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Project car tuner magazine

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a magazine, not reliably sourced as notable: of the 17 footnotes here, every single one is to the magazine itself. As usual, you do not make a magazine notable enough for Wikipedia by metareferencing it to itself: you make it notable by referencing it to media coverage about it that it didn't create itself. Bearcat (talk) 03:55, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:22, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:22, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:02, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Can't find any sources on it with a Google search other than this and mirrors. John M Wolfson (talk) 04:05, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. I was not able to find any sources in my searches that would allow the magazine to pass Notability. Cunard (talk) 05:03, 29 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.