Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project networks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio giuliano 09:32, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Project networks

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Patent nonsense. My speedy was declined, but I think it pretty clearly meets the definition: Content that, while apparently intended to mean something, is so confusing that no reasonable person can be expected to make any sense of it. Jfire (talk) 06:48, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete created by an SPA, completely unintelligible, largely unsourced and apparently either translated from an undisclosed Russian source or just OR. Mccapra (talk) 08:50, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:47, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Absolutely concur on patent nonsense. PianoDan (talk) 22:31, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete I suspect that this is a thing, but this article reads like an essay on the subject rather than an encyclopedia article. I'm also not sure whether all of the content is relevant to the presumed topic. I do find scholarly works that seem to cover this subject, like this and this. There are more. So I am open to the idea that the topic might be encyclopedic. However, this article is not. I would consider a TNT rewrite effort. Lamona (talk) 23:33, 3 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.