Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project termination


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Project management. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  10:50, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Project termination

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD (I realise, looking through the article history, that I'd inadvertently re-PROD'd it on seeing it on New Page Patrol), with the removal coming complete with no rationale on either occasion. This would appear to be a classic case of Wikipedia not being a how-to guide which should probably have been deleted due to the first PROD, but here we are. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 10:50, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Wikipedia is not a how to manual  Whispe ring  03:50, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to Project management, or merge there if anyone can identify content worth saving. --Pontificalibus (talk) 13:14, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:38, 9 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:24, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect as suggested  DGG ( talk ) 22:29, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete this very poorly written essay. I don't think the particular redirect here is correct - project termination is a separate phase from actual project management - this seems to me more related to liquidation on a project level. It might be possible to write a proper article on this subject, but this is a clear case of TNT.Icewhiz (talk) 08:14, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete no content worth saving. A redirect would be primarily to discourage re-creation. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 03:50, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Project management. Termination is usually a distinct phase in most frameworks, but this particular content is so badly written that would require WP:TNT to be really helpful.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 09:04, 24 September 2017 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.