Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prolicide


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Keeper &#448;  76  01:10, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Prolicide

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Prolicide hits up 4840 on Google, brief survey suggests that it is a depreciated term for the death of your children, born or unborn, or something like that. Non-notable dictionary term, of a dictionary being on the long list of things that WP:Wikipedia is not.--Tznkai (talk) 16:38, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:15, 8 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. Seems to be a disambiguation page. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:28, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: I'd say it's masquerading as one, but disambiguation pages tend to be about disparate uses of the same term--e.g., Bob (person) vs. Bob (song)--whereas this is basically a dicdef with wikilinked synonyms. Cosmic Latte (talk) 08:25, 9 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete: A dicdef with wikilinks is still a dicdef. Cosmic Latte (talk) 18:14, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * No, it's a disambiguation, between two articles on two subjects that would each, if the other did not exist, have a redirect here. That's one of the major reasons for disambiguation, and this is a perfectly valid disambiguation article. Uncle G (talk) 15:25, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Seems to be a useful navigational aid with respect to Wikipedia article topics atht are either referenced by the term or closely related. Replacing it by a redirect with a hat note seems to be a worse solution and removing it altogether would make Wikipedia less useful.--Tikiwont (talk) 14:05, 10 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.