Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Promethean Software Corporation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:41, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Promethean Software Corporation

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The subject of the article appears to be a non-notable software company. The subject lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails to meet the notability guidelines for organizations. Alpha_Quadrant   (talk)  21:39, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 3 February 2012 (UTC)


 * NOTEI am also nominating the following related pages because these are separate articles created for this business's products, and if the business is not notable, its products probably are not either.
 * - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 18:07, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
 * - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 18:07, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
 * - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 18:07, 3 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. This business makes back office software for lawyers, for automating forms and tracking time for billing purposes.  It's one of many such firms and products.  I've heard of the time and billing software, myself.  I can't think of any significant effects this business might have had on history, technology, or culture, and Google News appears not to know them.  There's no reason why future students of American law practice would need to know of this business or its products. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 18:14, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment I fully agree with you Ihcoyc. Those two articles should also be deleted. Alpha_Quadrant    (talk)  04:48, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete all of the above. WP:N and WP:NSOFT are there for a good reason. &mdash; Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 23:54, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.