Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prometheanism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Sango 123  03:01, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Prometheanism
Vanity article, not noteworthy and sourced only from a single website. No other articles link here that are not redirects, and article has been repeatedly removed from List of philosophies. Rosicrucian 02:47, 11 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, per above as I am the nominator.--Rosicrucian 02:52, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - Was this deleted before, maybe under another name? Tom Harrison Talk 13:11, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - Originally the article creator had a related article that went through AFD and was merged back into the parent article. There was also Prometheanism (philosophy), which seems to have been the same author trying to create the article, until it was later changed to a redirect to the original article. Some editors have tried to revise the article to prevent it from being a copyvio of the website linked, but this seems to be difficult to do because the website linked is apparently the only source on Prometheanism. Hence the nn and vanity clause. The author of the article has only edited on the article itself, or on List of philosophies to try to get the article listed (Contribs).--Rosicrucian 14:09, 11 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as original research. Prometheus got what he deserved. - Smerdis of Tlön 14:19, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, or Speedy delete as recreation of deleted material. Tom Harrison Talk 14:27, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. If the only sources for this "philosophy" are internet-based (as I think that they are), then it isn't notable enough for Wikpedia. NatusRoma | Talk 18:25, 11 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.