Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prometheus Entertainment


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Stifle (talk) 16:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Prometheus Entertainment

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't appear to be notable, there are no secondary references establishing its notability. Raykyogrou0  ( Talk ) 02:59, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article does not give much indication, but they get significant coverage from Variety:, , , .  Probably more at The Hollywood Reporter, too, but I don't think THR makes their archive freely available. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:08, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I think the article looks a bit better now. There's at least some kind of history and assertion of notability, but about half of the citations are trivial mentions that can't be used to establish notability.  Still, I think the linked articles on Variety go pretty far.  I tried checking a few other TV and film-related sites, but Prometheus Entertainment doesn't really seem to be a major player, like Amblin.  Still, they seem to be known for their pop culture documentaries and reality shows.  One of them even got a few Emmy nominations.  I guess that counts for something.  The biggest problem is that the article is rather heavily biased toward sourcing from Variety. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:51, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:59, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:59, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:59, 27 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Kevin Burns. There's some coverage of this company in reliable sources, but it's almost always passing mentions in the context of discussing Burns rather than anything in-depth about the company. The Variety sources listed above are good, but are mostly project announcements rather than discussions of the company.&mdash; alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 03:04, 27 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep Looks like there is enough out there to establish notability -- Cy be r XR ef ☎ 05:04, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.