Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Promine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  08:18, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Promine

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A contested proposed deletion, my rationale was: Keeping that as my AfD rationale. I am familiar with the product (although never used it myself), the market share comment is based on my own knowledge of the geo/mine modelling industry, you can choose to take it or leave it.. kelapstick(bainuu) 04:41, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * This product has a fairly small market share as far as geologic modelling and mining software packages go, and my search for usable souces came up with nil, so this will not pass the genearal notability guidelines.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:36, 29 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete, as notability of this company is not established. The article is a mixture of company and product with no distinct topic (infobox is about company, lead is about product) and no signs that any of those are notable. Each of such articles should be deleted. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 19:09, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.