Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Promine (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  01:37, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Promine
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article about a company that does not meet WP:ORGDEPTH and WP:SIGCOV. Only dependent on two sources which a large part of the article left totally unsourced since 2016. Jamiebuba (talk) 13:32, 4 June 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:40, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Canada. Jamiebuba (talk) 13:32, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Author here, I did some scanning online and have found very little additional sources of quality according to WP:ORGDEPTH. I have to agree with Jamiebuba on lack of conformity to WP:SIGCOV as well. Not my best work, I agree with proposal for deletion. Ruminater (talk) 14:39, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete per nom. All I can find is one iffy source, the Mining Suppliers Trading Association. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:07, 12 June 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.