Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Promo Disk 2005


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Jitters (band). Consensus is that the article is not notable. Redirecting to the band's article per comments citing NALBUM. ST47 (talk) 19:12, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Promo Disk 2005

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Couple of very brief blurbs in Muzykalnaya Gazeta, other than that, no significant coverage. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:27, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:27, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep We may witness 2 (two) review pieces by Олег «О’К» Климов (Aleh Klimay who wrote a lot under the moniker О’К), chief editor of Muzykalnaya Gazeta, a famous Belarusian music journalist, at hand. He was a music columnist over at Sovetskaya Belorussiya – Belarus' Segodnya (https://www.sb.by/author/153909-oleg-klimov/), anchor of music programs over at the National State Television and Radio Company of Belarus network, and more. We can read about his opinion's weight under the umbrella of Muzykalnaya Gazeta over the selected references here and its interwikies as well, while, according to the deletion discussions taken place on Open Space (Articles_for_deletion/Open_Space_(band)), Hair Peace Salon (Articles_for_deletion/Hair_Peace_Salon), we “should rely on such authoritative sources in the field of Belarusian music as "experty.by" or "Muzykalnaya Gazeta". Such sources attach importance to the subject of the article.”  -- Pr12402 13 September 2019.


 * Delete Fails WP:GNG Hughesdarren (talk) 22:19, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the WikiProject Deletion sorting/Belarus.  -- Pr12402 14 September 2019.

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to Jitters (band) per WP:NALBUM - Epinoia (talk) 01:37, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Unlike the recent example of an EP/6-tracks "album" (Articles for deletion/Building 429 (2000 album)) put into the deletion process, which was eventually considered unremarkable because of no references were found to back it up, there are 2 Muzykalnaya Gazeta review pieces, plus Hair Peace Salon's take on the collaboration at a later moment itself as well. -- Pr12402 21 September 2019.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Darkwind (talk) 23:25, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Have to agree with above comments. As it stands, the article shows no sign of notability with little to zero mainstream media coverage by reliable third party sources.  Rob van  vee  16:56, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Jitters (band) per WP:NALBUM and it could be a viable search term. With that being said, I am not entirely opposed to a deletion either. I just always favor redirecting an album or EP to an artist's page if possible just in case someone actually wants to learn more about it. Aoba47 (talk) 20:27, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:NALBUM.4meter4 (talk) 11:49, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I would like point out on a similar case, let's look at The Older I Get (EP). We may witness just 1 (one) review by Jesus Freak Hideout, a christian music blog the page about which was deleted four (4) times, at hand that, apparently, is sufficient to bolster up the article topic's notability to stay afloat, while Walter Görlitz just added the "More citations needed" tag with no AfD or so. ¯\_(°ヮ°)_/¯ -- Pr12402 30 September 2019.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.