Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Promontory (building)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 05:57, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Promontory (building)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBUILD: "Buildings, including private residences and commercial developments, may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." Does not have coverage that meets significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV. WP:BEFORE revealed advertising, WP:ROUTINE, WP:MILL coverage, and directory style listings.  // Timothy ::  talk  21:54, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  21:54, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  21:54, 1 November 2020 (UTC)


 * delete Well, at least there is some claim to notability, but the second or third tallest building in a city where nothing is all that tall is not much of a distinction. Mangoe (talk) 22:48, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and really isn't that tall Spiderone  22:52, 1 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:NBUILD and WP:GNG. -- The SandDoctor Talk 18:53, 8 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.