Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Promoting Immunization and Health Care in Aceh, Indonesia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ‑Scottywong | prattle _ 18:38, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Promoting Immunization and Health Care in Aceh, Indonesia

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No notability shown, creator seems to be an SPA Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:38, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Creater is an economics honors major from the National University of Singapore. You can view my profile here: facebook.com/junialum. This article was added on a neutral basis purely for academic reasons and do not contravene any guideline on Wikipedia. If parts of the entry needs to be changed or edited for clarification, please inform me (author). This article has provided significant coverage on this issue with a comprehensive case study. Sources are reliable with independent references. There is no question of self-publicity, advertising, etc. I do not in any way belong to any persons or organizations mentioned in this article. The article itself cites problems and is not a positively biased write up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Junialum (talk • contribs) 06:28, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * It must pass our general notability guidelines at the very least. You should also read Manual of Style/Layout for your next article. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:17, 9 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. The one pointer that could be a reliable source from PR Newswire, however remote, is more about Project HOPE than anything, not so much about the subject of this article.  The merits of the article must be held up independently of that. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 07:20, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:01, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 9 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete because it does not satisfy the requirement for notability, which requires significant coverage by independent reliable sources; all but one of the sources here are from Project HOPE itself. With that said, let me explain to the author of the article that we respect your credentials and we agree that this project is a worthy cause. But not every WP:WORTHYCAUSE can have an article here; we have to have standards to keep the encyclopedia from being flooded. There are, of course, other online venues and websites where you could post this entire essay and it would be welcome. As for Wikipedia, I would suggest that a summary of this information could be added to some other article, perhaps Nagan Raya Regency which is very much in need of expansion. I was going to suggest putting it in Project HOPE, but that article does not appear to include details about individual projects. --MelanieN (talk) 15:30, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete—non-notable good cause. All references (including the press release) are self published sources.   Liv it ⇑ Eh?/What? 18:30, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.