Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Promotion in Motion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 02:24, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Promotion in Motion

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The article seems to serve no purpose other than promotion. (speedy was declined) ChildofMidnight (talk) 06:31, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No claims of notablity made in the article; References given link to the company's website; A quick Google search turned up no reliable sources on this company.  Linguist At Large  06:38, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Concur. Fails WP:N. Geoff  TC 17:45, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:43, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:43, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Doesn't show notability per WP:CORP. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 22:34, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as no evidence of notability. --Gavin Collins (talk) 14:39, 15 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.