Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proofs against the hypothesis of Aryan Invasion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deletion as a copyright violation (in addition to being, obviously, a tendentious POV fork). Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:57, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Proofs against the hypothesis of Aryan Invasion

 * – ( View AfD View log )

OR, POV-fork, Synthesis - it reads like an essay more than anything. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:11, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - completely original research. There is a bibliography, but no evidence that the works listed support any of these assertions.  Sea photo Talk  18:38, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. Further evidence of POV-pushing here. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:03, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Author has commented on the Talk page. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:33, 11 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Logan Talk Contributions 20:31, 11 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Objection per nom. IndoWarrior I object on the grounds that all f you are Europeans and are obsessively biased. No Indian has viewed this page and thus you dont have any Indian opinion. You lack the ability to judge as I have pointed out earlier. Your "Indo-European Migration" article is baseless and no fact supports it. The genetic evidence is also against the Aryan migration mythos. So, in this light we need a large number of Indian scientists to review this page. Not Westerners as it is connected to INDIAN history. —Preceding undated comment added 20:46, 11 January 2011 (UTC).


 * Objection per nom. IndoWarrior You have also not spent any time validating my biblography or references either. You are very biased and obsessed with the baseless Aryan invasion Mythos —Preceding undated comment added 20:51, 11 January 2011 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.