Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Propaganda (The Sound album) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kharkiv07  ( T ) 14:49, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Propaganda (The Sound album)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I don't think one notable review (AllMusic) and a mention in the discography section of the Trouser Press article qualifies this as being notable enough to have its own article. FamblyCat94 (talk) 03:10, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Allmusic review and the Prefix coverage identified at the last AFD mean WP:GNG is passed. This nomination is too soon after the last one. Have restored the Prefix review that the nominator removed amid edit warring.Atlantic306 (talk) 04:53, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. As per first AfD, sufficient coverage exists. --Michig (talk) 05:42, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per first AfD; sufficient coverage.  Jujutsuan  ( Please notify with &#123;&#123;re&#125;&#125; &#124; talk &#x7C; contribs) 11:19, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Sufficient coverage per first AfD; Prefix is definitely a notable source.Greg Fasolino (talk) 14:02, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 06:19, 29 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. As per first AfD, sufficient coverage exists. --Dcirovic (talk) 16:17, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Agreed, as per first AfD. WP:SNOW? Robman94 (talk) 15:04, 30 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.