Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Property Notify


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  12:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Property Notify

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The government and various bureaucracies confirming existence does not make the subject notable. Not seeing a single source that would qualify as in-depth, independent, reliable coverage Slywriter (talk) 03:47, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Slywriter (talk) 03:47, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Engr.  Smitty   Werben 03:56, 7 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.