Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prophetic Art


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Deleted as copyvio. Peridon (talk) 22:04, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Prophetic Art

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Either hallucination or rambling, you decide. The user has also added spam links on the subject: icing on the cake. History2007 (talk) 20:25, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Delete Garbage. --Axel™ (talk) 20:38, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
 * You are being too kind. History2007 (talk) 20:38, 21 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Now tell us what you really think of the article :-) Delete by all means - it's a copyvio at the moment, but even if it were entirely rewritten there is no indication that this is a notable concept. --bonadea contributions talk 20:46, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Jokes aside, this is the tip of a large iceberg. In time, these types of additions will overrun the established users, taking time that would have gone to better use. And the presence of junk hinders donations in the long run. So it is serious. These things need to be nipped in the bud. Else it will cost time and money. History2007 (talk) 20:50, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.