Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Propofol for Narco-analysis; A novel and better alternative. Preliminary report of three cases.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 02:42, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Propofol for Narco-analysis; A novel and better alternative. Preliminary report of three cases.

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Taking it here because an earlier Prod nomination was removed. Looks like a fairly unambiguous case of WP:OR. Steamroller Assault (talk) 08:42, 11 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Definitely reeks of OR, and even if it is worth keeping, the article is written like an academic paper. fuzzy510 (talk) 10:30, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research. Stifle (talk) 10:47, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for plagarism concerns, or if not, original research concerns. It looks almost copied from another article, but I can't find it on PubMed. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 12:20, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Just an academic paper copied --  Tinu  Cherian  - 15:35, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:OR and possibly WP:C issue. KuyaBriBri Talk 16:05, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not posting your academic papers Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 16:35, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Certainly appears to be OR. At best, it needs re-writing from the ground up. Anaxial (talk) 19:23, 11 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.