Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proposals: Honduras Election 2013


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:32, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Proposals: Honduras Election 2013

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Written in poor English, this is either a bad translation from Spanish or a composition by someone not fluent in English. It's a duplicate of Honduran general election, 2013, but as it has a lot that's not in the other article, it's not A10 speedy deleteable. The whole thing is unreferenced except to candidates' websites, not particularly understandable (I've read it, but I'm not sure if these are candidates' position statements, topics for ballot initiatives, government policies that are up for voters' review, or something else), and nothing that I noticed would be a good candidate for merging to the other article. Even the title's implausible, so there's no good reason to redirect it. Nyttend (talk) 17:51, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 2 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 13:21, 8 September 2013 (UTC)


 * I can't accurately !vote until I can understand the article; the broken English makes it too difficult.  Erpert  WHAT DO YOU WANT??? 14:06, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Perhaps the article is broken beyond repair? Michaelzeng7 (talk) 23:00, 8 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete If there was any useful content, it should be covered in the general election article. As there isn't, just delete. Number   5  7  20:28, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.