Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proposed icebreakers of Canada


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:16, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Proposed icebreakers of Canada

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This is a redundant orphan article with very little existing unique content or potential for expansion. There is one historical Canadian icebreaker project, the Polar 8 Project (and the article also covers its short-lived predecessors, Polar 7 and Polar 10), and three ongoing projects (polar icebreakers, program icebreakers and multi-purpose vessels) under the National Shipbuilding Strategy (primarily covered here until they have progressed far enough to warrant a dedicated article). A separate article covering only Canadian icebreaker projects is therefore not needed; if everything goes as planned, in a few years it can be expected to shrink into covering just the cancelled 1980s project. In order to avoid content growing stale, I propose that Proposed icebreakers of Canada is deleted and effort is focused on individual project articles with summary either under NSS or, as it presently is, under the CCG equipment article. Tupsumato (talk) 13:00, 9 July 2023 (UTC)


 * As an alternative to deletion, the article could be merged to a new article/list Proposed ships of Canada covering also other projects in Category:Proposed ships of the Royal Canadian Navy and any non-RCN Canadian ships under Category:Proposed ships, Category:Cancelled ships etc. However, if "proposed ships of XXX" articles are not commonly created for countries, I am primarily proposing the deletion as per above. Tupsumato (talk) 13:06, 9 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete. As both proposed vessels have their own articles, there is no need for this one. Kablammo (talk) 14:23, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - no need for this page Llammakey (talk) 19:09, 9 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2023 July 17.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 17:24, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering and Canada. Karnataka (talk) 18:57, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree this article superfluous. It might be useful to have a link to Polar 8 Project in List of equipment of the Canadian Coast Guard, either under "Procurement" or in a new "Cancelled projects" section. Davidships (talk) 16:41, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Delete - there are so many other articles that the information about the Polar 8 and the proposed Class 2 icebreakers are covered by. I don't see that this article adds anything to those; nor is a reasonable search term. It's possible though, that there's space for a summary article of the various Canadian icebreakers, proposed, in-service, and under-construction for the Canadian Coast Guard and Royal Canadian Navy (a combined article given the class overlap). But this is not that article. BTW, there is also List of icebreakers Nfitz (talk) 07:00, 21 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.