Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proprietary DVR


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. – Will (message me!) 08:26, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Proprietary DVR
Google's 827 exact results with this term are not sufficient enough for its WP entry. There is no real intro to the article either. Non-notable tech jargon, it seems. --Slgr @ ndson (page - messages - contribs) 13:49, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete This article contains very jumbled information, with a lack of purpose, that shouldn't have its own article. --Porqin 14:16, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Neutral. As it stands, very confusing, badly written.  Doesn't really define its subject (software? hardware?). But if someone knows the topic, perhaps it could be made usable. Should be linked from or merged with Forensic video, which it refers to. -- Slowmover 15:41, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I am new to WP and I wrote the article.  Can you give me more time to improve it and clarify?  I work in the industry and can seek others who can help shape it, but I need to know how much time is allowed. Perhaps it just needs a better title.--Hartzz 19:39, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * You typically have 5 days from the AfD date, so until 18 July 2006. This looks like a borderline call to me, so you can probably save it. You really need some links to published articles that use this term, otherwise it probably violates Avoid neologisms.  I'll try to visit back and "cast" my opinion after your edits.  Good luck. --Satori Son 14:03, 14 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep Hartzz did flesh out the article more and it does seem to be "technological notable". I would add a source tag and give the article more life. Agne27 15:40, 18 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.