Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proprietary colonies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was merge into Thirteen Colonies. – Jitse Niesen (talk) 00:28, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

Proprietary colonies
This article borders on the nonsensical, def. a delete, maybe even a speedy./ --Isolani 14:53, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now.  No opinion, though it doesn't look like a speedy to me. &mdash;Cryptic (talk) 18:50, 19 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep While a mess of an article, it seems like an encyclopedic concept that should be retained especially if incorporated in historical articles. --Reflex Reaction 21:38, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge into Thirteen Colonies if the information is verifiable. -- howcheng  [ talk &#149; contribs &#149; web ] 22:06, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Mergeable for sure, and Thirteen Colonies sounds like a good place to put it.  freshgavin TALK  02:06, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * weak keep or merge to Thirteen Colonies. An article could be written on the subject, but this ain't it. Youngamerican 03:36, 20 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.