Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prosecutor v. Milan Martic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. StarM 04:56, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Prosecutor v. Milan Martic

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not an encyclopedia article.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 21:17, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep clearly notable court case with third party sources, just not written in an encyclopedic style.--Boshinoi (talk) 21:21, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Plenty of third-party sources are given in the article for this ICTY case. The article just needs a little clean-up, it was obviously written by a new user. That's not a valid reason to delete it. If you're not willing to do any formatting work yourself, please tag such articles with and/or  as appropriate instead of trying to delete them. VG &#x260E; 02:17, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 12 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.